Prepregnancy Counseling and Care
Overview
Panel's Recommendations |
---|
|
Rating of Recommendations: A = Strong; B = Moderate; C = Optional Rating of Evidence: I = One or more randomized trials with clinical outcomes and/or validated laboratory endpoints; II = One or more well-designed, nonrandomized trials or observational cohort studies with long-term clinical outcomes; III = Expert opinion |
Overview
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), and other national organizations recommend offering comprehensive family planning and the opportunity to receive prepregnancy counseling and care as a component of routine primary medical care when there is the potential for pregnancy. The purpose of prepregnancy care is to improve health before conception by identifying risk factors for maternal and fetal adverse outcomes, tailoring education and counseling to individual needs, and treating or stabilizing medical conditions to optimize outcomes for the pregnancy and the fetus/newborn.1,2 Prepregnancy care is not something that occurs in a single clinical visit; rather, it requires integrating ongoing care and interventions into primary care to address needs during the different stages of reproductive life. Integrating comprehensive family planning and prepregnancy care into routine HIV health care visits can help patients reach their desired reproductive outcomes by supporting them to make informed decisions about their fertility and contraceptive use that are aligned with their preferences and reproductive goals.3-6 Providers should initiate and document a nonjudgmental conversation with all people of reproductive age about their reproductive desires because they may be reluctant to bring up the subject themselves.7-12
A meta-analysis of 50 studies found a 42% prevalence of fertility desire among people with HIV. In a pooled analysis, fertility desire was associated with being on antiretroviral therapy (ART), male sex, being younger than 30, being married or cohabitating, having a secondary education or higher, and being childless.13 In a retrospective study among 255 women with HIV, 69 (27.1%) reported an intended pregnancy. Those with intended pregnancies were more likely to be older, White, married, privately insured, and college educated. They were less likely than those with unintended pregnancies to use tobacco, alcohol, opiates, or cocaine during pregnancy; more likely to disclose their HIV status to the father of the baby by delivery; and more likely to receive less effective contraception (e.g., condoms) postpartum. In a multivariate analysis, pregnancy intendedness was an important predictor of nondetectable viral load at pregnancy entry but not at delivery.14 Pregnancy intentions may not be binary and may change over time, thus underscoring the need for health care providers to engage in ongoing discussions to support dynamic pregnancy intentions.11
Health care providers who routinely care for people of reproductive age with HIV play an important role in promoting prepregnancy health and informed reproductive decisions. However, even among providers who offer primary HIV care, the delivery of comprehensive reproductive counseling often falls short of the current guidelines.15-17
The fundamental principles of prepregnancy counseling and care are outlined in the CDC Preconception Care Work Group’s Recommendations to Improve Preconception Health and Health Care and in ACOG’s Prepregnancy Counseling guidance. In addition to the general components of prepregnancy counseling and care that are appropriate for all people of reproductive age, people with HIV have specific needs that should be addressed.18-21
- Discuss reproductive options; routinely assess pregnancy intentions throughout the course of care; and, when appropriate, make referrals to HIV and reproductive health specialists, including experts in reproductive endocrinology and infertility when necessary. The HIV status of one or both parents should not be a reason to withhold standard of care infertility treatment and assist individuals and couples in reaching their desired reproductive outcomes.
- When pregnancy is not currently desired, offer a full range of contraceptive methods to help achieve fertility goals. In the context of HIV, all available contraceptive methods, including hormonal contraception (e.g., pill, patch, ring, injection, implant) and intrauterine devices (IUDs) can be used; see Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use.22 Providers should be aware of the presence of other medical co-morbidities and potential interactions between antiretroviral (ARV) drugs, hormonal contraceptives, and other medications that could lower contraceptive efficacy or increase the risk of such adverse effects as blood clots (see Table 3 below).
- Offer emergency contraception as appropriate, including emergency contraceptive pills and IUDs (see the ACOG Practice Bulletin on Emergency Contraception). Emergency contraceptive pills that contain estrogen and progestin and those that only contain levonorgestrel (LNG) may have interactions with ARV drugs that are similar to the ones observed with combined oral contraceptives.23 AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) 5375 showed that doubling the dose of LNG from 1.5 mg to 3 mg in women receiving efavirenz (EFV)-based ART helped overcome the drug–drug interaction with this ARV.24,25 No data are available on potential interactions between ARV drugs and ulipristal acetate, a progesterone receptor modulator; however, ulipristal acetate is metabolized predominantly by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4, so interactions may occur (see the HIV Drug Interaction Checker).
- When pregnancy is being contemplated, use the prepregnancy period to modify the ARV regimen to optimize virologic suppression and minimize potential adverse effects (see Recommendations for the Use of Antiretroviral Drugs During Pregnancy and Table 7). In the context of perinatally acquired HIV, there may be more difficulty maintaining viral suppression, a greater likelihood of multidrug-resistant virus, and there may be a benefit to providing additional psychosocial and/or adherence support26 (see Prenatal Care, Antiretroviral Therapy, and HIV Management When HIV Was Perinatally Acquired).
- Recognize that patients whose self-expression is less common may have special needs.27 For example, the use of testosterone may induce hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal axis suppression, leading to decreased ovulation.28
- Recognize that the primary HIV treatment goal when pregnancy is being planned should include sustained suppression of plasma HIV viral load below the limit of detection before conception for personal health, to minimize the risk of perinatal HIV transmission, and to prevent sexual HIV transmission to a partner without HIV (see Reproductive Options When One or Both Partners Have HIV). When pregnancy is being considered or planned, counseling should include that with ART started before pregnancy and an undetectable viral load maintained throughout pregnancy and delivery, the risk of HIV transmission to the infant is extremely low (<1%).29,30
- Explain that people with HIV who take ART as prescribed and who achieve and maintain an undetectable viral load will not transmit HIV through sex, commonly known as Undetectable = Untransmittable or U=U. For more information, see Let’s Stop HIV Together.
- Encourage disclosure of HIV status to partners or co-parents before pregnancy if doing so is safe. However, this disclosure should not be a requirement of assisting couples in achieving pregnancy.
- Encourage sexual partners to receive HIV counseling and testing so that they can seek HIV care if they have HIV or seek advice about HIV prevention, including pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), if they do not have HIV (see Pre-exposure Prophylaxis [PrEP] to Prevent HIV During Periconception, Antepartum, and Postpartum Periods).
- Ask about the use of alcohol, tobacco, and other substances. Provide or refer to evidence-based interventions for substance use disorder, including medication-assisted treatment for opioid use disorder (e.g., methadone, buprenorphine), and counsel on how to manage health risks (e.g., access to a syringe services program). A 2019 analysis31 reported that overall, 39% of women with HIV of reproductive age reported current drinking and 10% reported binge drinking. Compared to non-drinkers, binge drinkers were less likely to adhere to ART or be virally suppressed and more likely to smoke and use drugs. Between 2007 and 2019, marijuana use during pregnancy among women with HIV increased from 7.1% to 11.7%, whereas alcohol and opioid use were unchanged. Postpartum alcohol (44.4%), marijuana (13.6%), and concomitant alcohol and marijuana (10%) use were common; marijuana use increased from 10.2% in 2006 to 23.7% in 2019, whereas postpartum alcohol use was unchanged.32
- Counsel on maintaining a healthy diet and healthy weight before and during pregnancy.
- When pregnancy is being contemplated, counsel to take a daily multivitamin that contains 400 mcg of folic acid to help prevent neural tube defects (NTDs). When there is a history of having a child with NTDs, there is a family history of NTDs, or when certain anti-epileptic medications, especially when using valproic acid, a higher dose (1,000–4,000 mcg) of folic acid can be prescribed. Higher doses of folate may also be considered for people receiving trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole who are trying to conceive (see Special Considerations in Pregnancy in Pneumocystis Pneumonia in the Adult and Adolescent Opportunistic Guidelines.
- Optimize the health of people with HIV prior to pregnancy (e.g., ensure appropriate folate intake; test for all sexually transmitted infections and treat as indicated; consider the teratogenic potential of all prescribed medications; consider switching to safer medications; encourage cessation of tobacco, alcohol, and other substances; optimize management of chronic health conditions).
- Educate and counsel about the risk factors for perinatal HIV transmission, the strategies to reduce those risks, and the potential effects HIV or taking ARV drugs during pregnancy may have on the course of pregnancy and maternal and fetal health outcomes.
- Support shared decision-making about ART. Educate and counsel on the factors that affect the selection of ARVs when trying to conceive, during pregnancy, or during postpartum. For more information, see Recommendations for Use of Antiretroviral Drugs During Pregnancy: Overview.
- Consider the following factors when prescribing ART and there is the possibility of pregnancy: the regimen’s effectiveness, changes in ARV pharmacokinetics (PK) in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy, hepatitis B virus (HBV) status, possible adverse maternal and fetal health outcomes,, and the likelihood of developing drug resistance.33-35
- Provide patient-centered, evidence-based counseling to support shared decision-making about infant feeding (see Preventing HIV Transmission During Infant Feeding). Information about and plans for infant feeding should be reviewed throughout pregnancy and again after delivery.
- Evaluate and manage ART-associated adverse effects (e.g., hyperglycemia, anemia, hepatotoxicity) that may affect maternal and fetal health outcomes.
- Administer all vaccines as indicated (see CDC’s Recommended Immunization Schedule and ACOG’s Maternal Immunization Practice Advisory, 2022), which includes vaccination for influenza, pneumococcus, HBV, tetanus, and SARS-CoV-2.36 Tdap (tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis) vaccination should be performed during each pregnancy, including pregnancies impacted by HIV, typically between 27 and 36 weeks of gestation but preferably as early in this time window as possible.
- Ask about safety at home and offer assistance or referrals to those experiencing intimate partner violence or requesting assistance.
Drug–Drug Interactions Between Hormonal Contraceptives and Antiretroviral Therapy
Data on drug interactions between ARVs and hormonal contraceptives primarily come from drug labels and several studies on the PK and pharmacodynamics among the different forms of contraception and ARVs.37-39 The contraceptive effectiveness of the LNG IUD is largely through local (i.e., intrauterine) release of LNG, not through systemic absorption. CDC’s U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use lists the LNG IUD as category 1 (no restrictions) in drug interactions with all ARVs in women who already have an IUD and category 1/2 (benefits outweigh risk) for those initiating the use of an IUD.
Hormonal contraceptives can be used with ARVs in the context of HIV without other contraindications. The contraception effect is usually attributable to the progestin component of contraceptives. Drug interactions that decrease concentrations of the progestin component may affect contraceptive efficacy. An alternative or additional contraceptive method may be recommended when drug interactions are known. When using darunavir/ritonavir-based ART, an alternative or additional contraception may be considered because the area under the curve (AUC) for oral contraceptive hormones may be decreased.40 Cobicistat-boosted protease inhibitors are contraindicated with drosperinone-containing hormonal contraceptives due to the potential for hyperkalemia.41 Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) can be used without restriction because of its relatively higher dose than other progesterone-based contraception, and limited studies have shown no significant interaction between DMPA and ARVs.42-45
Several studies have shown that the use of EFV decreases the effectiveness of hormonal implants and hormonal vaginal rings. Although contraceptive implants (e.g., etonogestrel [ENG], LNG) generally can be used when using ARVs, both PK and clinical data suggest that these implants have decreased efficacy when used with EFV-based regimens.46-49 LNG implants are not available in the United States. A PK evaluation reported that the geometric mean ratios of LNG concentrations (patients taking EFV-based ART vs. ART-naive patients) were 0.53 at 24 weeks and 0.43 at 48 weeks. Three pregnancies occurred in the EFV group (15%) between Week 36 and Week 48, whereas no pregnancies occurred in the ART-naive or nevirapine (NVP) groups.50
Tuberculosis Treatment, Antiretrovirals, and Contraception
Other medications, such as concomitant tuberculosis (TB) treatment with EFV, may also have drug–drug interactions with contraceptives. PK studies of HIV/TB coinfection when using EFV-based HIV treatment and rifampicin-based TB treatment show increased metabolism of DMPA and levonorgestrel emergency contraception, suggesting that redosing DMPA more frequently or doubling the dose of emergency contraception may be required for effective contraception.25,51-54
Vaginal Ring
For the ENG/EE contraceptive vaginal ring (NuvaRing), PK evaluation showed that ENG levels were 79% lower and EE levels were 59% lower in participants on EFV-based ART regimens compared with the control group.56 A newer contraceptive vaginal ring containing segesterone/EE (Annovera) also is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, but no drug–drug interaction studies with this contraceptive ring and ARVs have been reported to date. The segesterone and EE in the Annovera vaginal ring may be metabolized in the same way as ENG and EE in the NuvaRing (see Table 3 below).56
Table 3. Drug Interactions Between Antiretroviral Agents and Hormonal Contraceptives
Table 3 provides a summary of drug interactions between antiretroviral (ARV) agents and hormonal contraceptives, with recommendations for contraceptive dosing and additional contraceptive protection. Because data are limited on pregnancy rates when using different hormonal contraceptives and ARVs, some of the dosing recommendations in Table 3 are based on consensus expert opinion. Whenever possible, the recommendations are based on available data regarding pharmacokinetic interactions between ARVs and combined hormonal methods, depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, and levonorgestrel and etonogestrel implants.
Additional information can be found in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Update to U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2016: Updated Recommendations for the Use of Contraception Among Women at High Risk for HIV Infection.57
Non-nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors (NNRTIs) | |
---|---|
Efavirenz (EFV) | |
Dosing Recommendation/Clinical Comment for COC/P/R, POPs, and ENG Implants | If efficacy is of primary importance, consider an alternative method (or a reliable method of barrier contraception in addition to this method). |
Dosing Recommendation/Clinical Comment for DMPAa | No additional contraceptive protection is needed. |
Effect on Contraceptive Drug Levels and the Contraceptive’s Effects on ART and HIV | COC No effect on EE concentrations ↓ active metabolites of norgestimate; LNG AUC ↓ 83% and norelgestromin AUC ↓ 64%58 ENG (in COC) C24h ↓ 61%59 ENG ↓ 79%; EE ↓ 59%56 DMPA No effect on DMPA levels42,43 DMPA AUC ↓ 33% to 35% when coadministered with EFV, rifampin, and INH. More frequent DMPA dosing may be appropriate.54 ENG Implant ENG ↓ below the level necessary to prevent pregnancy (90 pg/mL) in 60% receiving EFV60 ↓ 49% ENG concentration61 ENG AUC ↓ 63% to 82%49,62 LNG Implant ↓ 61% LNG concentration61 LNG AUC ↓ 47%50 ↑ pregnancy incidence rate among women using LNG or ENG implants, more among ENG users63 LNG AUC ↓ 40% to 73% over 30 months of use64 Doubling the dose of LNG implant from 150 mg to 300 mg did not overcome the decrease in LNG concentration.65 LNG Emergency Contraception (Oral Dosing) LNG (emergency contraception) AUC ↓ 58%23 Cmax was 51% higher with 3 mg LNG (24.9 ng/mL) than with 1.5 mg (15.1 ng/mL), and the 48-hour concentration was 66% higher (0.6 vs. 0.3 ng/mL, respectively). Dose adjustment of LNG EC from 1.5 mg to 3 mg helped to overcome the drug–drug interaction in women receiving EFV-based ART.24 Vaginally Administered ENG/EE (Vaginal Ring) ENG ↓ 93% in CYP2B6 slow metabolizers and ↓ 75% in normal and intermediate metabolizers66 EE ↓ 75% in slow metabolizers and ↓ 41% in normal and intermediate metabolizers66 Changes in ARV Levels and/or Effects on HIV COC No effect on EFV concentrations58 EFV C12h ↓ 22%; under therapeutic threshold in 3 of 16 participants59 DMPA No effect on HIV disease progression42,67,68 No effect on EFV concentrations42 LNG Implant No effect on HIV disease progression50 |
Clinical Studies | COC No difference in pregnancy rates69 Pregnancy rate was 13% higher in women using COCs and EFV than in women using COCs alone.48,70 Progesterone >3 ng/mL (a surrogate for ovulation) in 3 of 16 women71 No ovulations58 DMPA No increase in pregnancies42,48,68,69 Low endogenous progesterone, consistent with no ovulation42,43,68 ENG Implant Pregnancy rate was higher with EFV compared with no ART but still lower with implants than with other hormonal methods of contraception48 Presumptive ovulation in 5%62 LNG Implant 12% pregnancy rate47 15% pregnancy rate50 Pregnancy rate was higher with EFV compared with no ART but still lower with implants than with other hormonal methods of contraception.48 No increase in pregnancy rate69 |
Justification/Evidence for Recommendation | For COCs, some studies suggest higher pregnancy rate and ovulation rate and decreased progestin levels. EFV levels may decrease, but clinical significance is unclear. For DMPA, evidence does not show effects on pregnancy rate, ovulation, or DMPA levels. Also, no effect on HIV disease progression or EFV levels. More frequent DMPA dosing may be appropriate for women receiving rifampicin, INH, and EFV. For implants, some studies suggest higher pregnancy rate and decreased hormone levels. For vaginally administered ENG/EE, PK evaluation showed that ENG levels were 79% lower and EE levels were 59% lower in participants on EFV than in controls after 21 days.56 |
Etravirine (ETR) | |
Dosing Recommendation/Clinical Comment for COC/P/R, POPs, DMPAa, ENG Implants | No additional contraceptive protection is needed. |
Effect on Contraceptive Drug Levels and the Contraceptive’s Effects on ART and HIV | EE AUC ↑ 22%72 No significant effect on NE72 |
Clinical Studies | COC No ovulations75 |
Justification/Evidence for Recommendation | For COCs, one study found no ovulations and no significant change in progestin levels. No data on POPs. |
Nevirapine (NVP) | |
Dosing Recommendation/Clinical Comment for COC/P/R, POPs, DMPAa, ENG Implants | No additional contraceptive protection is needed. |
Effect on Contraceptive Drug Levels and the Contraceptive’s Effects on ART and HIV | EE AUC ↓ 29%;73 no change in EE AUC74 NE AUC ↓ 18%73 ENG (in COC) C24h ↓ 22%59 DMPA No significant change42 LNG Implant LNG AUC ↑ 35%50 ↑ pregnancy incidence rate among women using LNG or ENG implants, more among ENG users63 Changes in ARV Levels and/or Effects on HIV COC No significant effect on NVP levels71,73,75 DMPA No effect on HIV disease progression42,67,68,76 LNG Implant No effect on HIV disease progression50,77 |
Clinical Studies | COC No increase in pregnancy rate48,69,70,78,79 No ovulations71,74,79 DMPA No increase in pregnancy rates48,68,69,78 Low serum progesterone, consistent with no ovulation42 ENG Implant No increase in pregnancy rate48 LNG Implant No increase in pregnancy rate47,48,50,69,77 |
Justification/Evidence for Recommendation | For COCs, evidence does not show effects on pregnancy rate or ovulations. Evidence demonstrated a small decrease in progestin levels. No effect on NVP levels. For DMPA, evidence does not show effects on pregnancy rate, ovulation, or DMPA levels. No effect on HIV disease progression. For implants, evidence does not show effects on pregnancy rate or HIV disease progression. |
Rilpivirine (Oralb RPV) | |
Dosing Recommendation/Clinical Comment for COC/P/R, POPs, DMPAa, ENG or LNG Implants | No additional contraceptive protection is needed. |
Effect on Contraceptive Drug Levels and the Contraceptive’s Effects on ART and HIV | EE AUC ↑ 14%80 No significant change on NE80 Changes in ARV Levels and/or Effects on HIV COC No change in RPV levels compared to historical controls80 ENG or LNG Implants ENG and LNG concentrations not altered with RPV-based38 |
Clinical Studies | COC No change in progesterone80 |
Justification/Evidence for Recommendation | For COCs, evidence does not show effects on ovulation or progestin levels. No change in RPV levels. No data on POPs |
Doravirine (DOR) | |
Dosing Recommendation/Clinical Comment for COC/P/R, POPs, DMPAa, ENG Implants | No additional contraceptive protection is needed. |
Effect on Contraceptive Drug Levels and the Contraceptive’s Effects on ART and HIV | No clinically significant interaction with EE and LNG81 |
Clinical Studies | N/A |
Justification/Evidence for Recommendation | No clinical data |
Ritonavir (RTV)-Boosted Protease Inhibitors (PIs) | |
Atazanavir/Ritonavir (ATV/r) | |
Dosing Recommendation/Clinical Comment for COC/P/R, POPs, DMPAa, ENG Implants | No additional contraceptive protection is needed. |
Effect on Contraceptive Drug Levels and the Contraceptive’s Effects on ART and HIV | EE AUC ↓ 19%82 Norgestimate AUC ↑ 85%82 POP NE AUC ↑ 50%83 Vaginally Administered ENG/EE ENG ↑ 71% EE ↓ 38%56 |
Clinical Studies | N/A |
Justification/Evidence for Recommendation | For COCs, increase in progestin levels seen in only one study. Using a COC with at least 35 mcg/day may decrease breakthrough bleeding. For POPs, increase in progestin levels seen in only one study RTV inhibits CYP3A4, which may increase contraceptive hormone levels. |
Darunavir/Ritonavir (DRV/r) | |
Dosing Recommendation/Clinical Comment for COC/P/R, POPs, and ENG or LNG Implants | If efficacy is of primary importance, can consider an alternative method (or a reliable method of barrier contraception in addition to this method) |
Dosing Recommendation/Clinical Comment for DMPAa | No additional contraceptive protection is needed. |
Effect on Contraceptive Drug Levels and the Contraceptive’s Effects on ART and HIV | EE AUC ↓ 44%40 NE AUC ↓ 14%40 ENG or LNG Implants Progestin concentrations higher with DRV/r-based ART but no related adverse effects38 |
Clinical Studies | N/A |
Justification/Evidence for Recommendation | For COCs, small decrease in progestin levels No data on POPs |
Lopinavir/Ritonavir (LPV/r) | |
Dosing Recommendation/Clinical Comment for COC/P/R, POPs, DMPAa, ENG Implants | No additional contraceptive protection is needed. |
Effect on Contraceptive Drug Levels and the Contraceptive’s Effects on ART and HIV | EE AUC ↓ 55%84 NE AUC ↓ 17% Patch EE AUC ↓ 45%84 Norelgestromin AUC ↑ 83%84 DMPA DMPA AUC ↑ 46%44 ENG Implant ENG AUC ↑ 52%62 Changes in ARV Levels and/or Effects on HIV Patch LPV/r ↓ 19%84 DMPA No effect on HIV disease progression44 No change in LPV/r levels44 |
Clinical Studies | COC Trend of increased pregnancy rate, but CIs overlap48 Patch Low serum progesterone84 consistent with no ovulations (n = 8) DMPA No pregnancies and no ovulations44 Trend of increased pregnancy rate, but CIs overlap48 ENG Implant No increase in pregnancy rate48 LNG Implant No increase in pregnancy rate47,48 |
Justification/Evidence for Recommendation | For COCs, nonsignificant increase in pregnancy rate and small decrease in progestin level. For patch, no ovulations, and progestin levels increased. For DMPA, evidence shows no effect on pregnancy rate or ovulations. Progestin levels increased. For implants, evidence shows no effect on pregnancy rate. Progestin levels increased. |
Cobicistat (COBI)-Boosted Protease Inhibitors (PIs) | |
Atazanavir/Cobicistat (ATV/c) | |
Dosing Recommendation/Clinical Comment for COC/P/R | Contraindicated with drospirenone-containing hormonal contraceptives due to potential for hyperkalemia. |
Dosing Recommendation/Clinical Comment for POPs, DMPAa, ENG Implants | No additional contraceptive protection is needed. |
Effect on Contraceptive Drug Levels and the Contraceptive’s Effects on ART and HIV | Drospirenone AUC ↑ 2.3-fold41 No change in LNG concentration 25% decrease in EE C2485 |
Clinical Studies | N/A |
Justification/Evidence for Recommendation | No data on POPs |
Darunavir/Cobicistat (DRV/c) | |
Dosing Recommendation/Clinical Comment for COC/P/R | Clinical monitoring is recommended when DRV/c is used in combination with drospirenone-containing COCs as a result of the potential for hyperkalemia. |
Dosing Recommendation/Clinical Comment for POPs, DMPAa, ENG Implants | No additional contraceptive protection is needed. |
Effect on Contraceptive Drug Levels and the Contraceptive’s Effects on ART and HIV | Drospirenone AUC ↑ 1.6-fold EE AUC ↓ 30%41 |
Clinical Studies | N/A |
Justification/Evidence for Recommendation | No data on POPs |
Protease Inhibitors (PIs) Without Ritonavir (RTV) | |
Atazanavir (ATV) | |
Dosing Recommendation/Clinical Comment for COC/P/R | Prescribe oral contraceptive that contains no more than 30 mcg of EE or recommend alternative contraceptive method. |
Dosing Recommendation/Clinical Comment for POPs, DMPAa, ENG Implants | No additional contraceptive protection is needed. |
Effect on Contraceptive Drug Levels and the Contraceptive’s Effects on ART and HIV | COC EE AUC ↑ 48%86 NE AUC ↑ 110%86 |
Clinical Studies | N/A |
Justification/Evidence for Recommendation | For COCs, increased concentrations of estrogen and progestin, but the only data available are from the product label. No data on POPs |
CCR5 Antagonist | |
Maraviroc (MVC) | |
Dosing Recommendation/Clinical Comment for COC/P/R, POPs, DMPAa, ENG Implants | No additional contraceptive protection is needed. |
Effect on Contraceptive Drug Levels and the Contraceptive’s Effects on ART and HIV | COC No significant effect on EE or LN87 |
Clinical Studies | N/A |
Justification/Evidence for Recommendation | For COCs, no change in EE or progestin. No clinical data. No data on POPs |
Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors (INSTIs) | |
Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF) | |
Dosing Recommendation/Clinical Comment for COC/P/R, POPs, DMPAa, ENG Implants | No additional contraceptive protection is needed. |
Effect on Contraceptive Drug Levels and the Contraceptive’s Effects on ART and HIV | No significant drug interactions with EE or norgestimate |
Clinical Studies | N/A |
Justification/Evidence for Recommendation | No clinical data |
Dolutegravir (DTG) | |
Dosing Recommendation/Clinical Comment for COC/P/R, POPs, DMPAa, ENG Implants | No additional contraceptive protection is needed. |
Effect on Contraceptive Drug Levels and the Contraceptive’s Effects on ART and HIV | COC No significant effect on ENG implants60 No significant effect on norgestimate or EE No change in DTG AUC88 |
Clinical Studies | N/A |
Justification/Evidence for Recommendation | For COCs, no change in EE or progestin. No clinical data. No data on POPs |
Elvitegravir/Cobicistat (EVG/c) | |
Dosing Recommendation/Clinical Comment for COC/P/R, POPs, DMPAa, ENG Implants | No additional contraceptive protection is needed. |
Effect on Contraceptive Drug Levels and the Contraceptive’s Effects on ART and HIV | COC Norgestimate AUC ↑ 126% EE AUC ↓ 25%89,90 |
Clinical Studies | N/A |
Justification/Evidence for Recommendation | When administered as the four-drug regimen EVG/c/FTC/TDF, increases in progestin and a small decrease in EE were observed. No clinical data. No data on POPs |
Raltegravir (RAL) | |
Dosing Recommendation/Clinical Comment for COC/P/R, POPs, DMPAa, ENG Implants | No additional contraceptive protection is needed. |
Effect on Contraceptive Drug Levels and the Contraceptive’s Effects on ART and HIV | COC No change in EE Norgestimate AUC ↑ 14%91 |
Clinical Studies | N/A |
Justification/Evidence for Recommendation | For COCs, no change in EE concentrations and a small increase in progestin concentrations. No clinical data. No data on POPs. |
Long-Acting Cabotegravir (CAB-LA) | |
Dosing Recommendation/Clinical Comment for COC/P/R, POPs, DMPAa, ENG Implants | No additional contraceptive protection is needed. |
Effect on Contraceptive Drug Levels and the Contraceptive’s Effects on ART and HIV | Oral contraceptive use was associated with lower CAB-LA Cmax than for women not on any hormonal contraception (GMR 0.75; 90% CI, 0.59–0.93; P = 0.033). However, oral contraceptive use did not result in significant differences in other CAB-LA PK parameters. |
Clinical Studies | N/A |
Justification/Evidence for Recommendation | Although oral contraceptive use was associated with lower CAB-LA peak concentration, no differences in other PK parameters were observed, suggesting that the association is not likely to be clinically significant. |
Entry and Attachment Inhibitors | |
Fostemsavir (FTR) | |
Dosing Recommendation/Clinical Comment for COC/P/R, POPs, DMPAa, ENG Implants | No additional contraceptive protection is needed. |
Effect on Contraceptive Drug Levels and the Contraceptive’s Effects on ART and HIV | Temsavir (the active moiety of FTR) increased EE concentrations by 40% but had no effect on NE concentrations. EE dose should not exceed 30 µg or equivalent.92 FTR did not impact progestin. Progestin-only and nonhormonal contraceptives will not be affected by FTR. |
Clinical Studies | N/A |
Justification/Evidence for Recommendation | No clinical data |
a Because the hormonal levels achieved with DMPA are substantially higher than the levels that are required for contraception, any small reduction in hormonal level attributed to ARV drugs is unlikely to reduce contraceptive effectiveness. b No data are available for long-acting RPV. Key to Symbols: ↑ = increase ↓ = decrease Key: ART = antiretroviral therapy; ARV = antiretroviral; ATV = atazanavir; ATV/c = atazanavir/cobicistat; ATV/r = atazanavir/ritonavir; AUC = area under the curve; BIC = bictegravir; C12h = concentration at 12 hours postdose; C24h = concentration at 24 hours postdose; CAB-LA = long-acting cabotegravir; CI = confidence interval; Cmax; = maximum plasma concentration; COBI = cobicistat; COC = combined oral contraceptives; COC/P/R = COC/patch/ring; CYP = cytochrome P450; DMPA = depot medroxyprogesterone acetate; DOR = doravirine; DRV/c = darunavir/cobicistat; DRV/r = darunavir/ritonavir; DTG = dolutegravir; EC = emergency contraception; EE = ethinyl estradiol; EFV = efavirenz; ENG = etonogestrel; ETR = etravirine; EVG/c = elvitegravir/cobicistat; FTC = emtricitabine; FTR = fostemsavir; GMR = geometric mean ratio; INH = isoniazid; INSTI = integrase strand transfer inhibitor; LNG = levonorgestrel; LPV/r = lopinavir/ritonavir; MVC = maraviroc; NE = norethindrone; NNRTI = non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor; NVP = nevirapine; PI = protease inhibitor; PK = pharmacokinetic; POP = progesterone-only oral contraceptive pills; RAL = raltegravir; RPV = rilpivirine; RTV = ritonavir; TAF = tenofovir alafenamide; TDF = tenofovir disoproxil fumarate Sources: Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents; Adult and Adolescent Antiretroviral Guidelines; Table 24a, Table 24b, and Table 24d |
References
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG committee opinion no. 762: prepregnancy counseling. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(1):e78-e89. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30575679.
- Elwood C, Kennedy VL, Loutfy M, et al. The Canadian HIV pregnancy planning guidelines: what pregnancy care providers need to know about HIV transmission and pre-conception considerations. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2021;43(7):884-887. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33272875.
- Salters K, Loutfy M, de Pokomandy A, et al. Pregnancy incidence and intention after HIV diagnosis among women living with HIV in Canada. PLoS One. 2017;12(7):e0180524. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28727731.
- Aebi-Popp K, Mercanti V, Voide C, et al. Neglect of attention to reproductive health in women with HIV infection: contraceptive use and unintended pregnancies in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study. HIV Med. 2018;19(5):339-346. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29336516.
- Sutton MY, Zhou W, Frazier EL. Unplanned pregnancies and contraceptive use among HIV-positive women in care. PLoS One. 2018;13(5):e0197216. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29771940.
- Dude AM, Miller ES, Garcia PM, et al. Unintended pregnancy and viral suppression in pregnant women living with HIV. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021;3(2):100300. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33359637.
- Rahangdale L, Stewart A, Stewart RD, et al. Pregnancy intentions among women living with HIV in the United States. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2014;65(3):306-11. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24525467.
- Matthews LT, Beyeza-Kashesya J, Cooke I, et al. Consensus statement: supporting safer conception and pregnancy for men and women living with and affected by HIV. AIDS Behav. 2018;22(6):1713-1724. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28501964.
- Cohn SE, Haddad LB, Sheth AN, et al. Parenting desires among individuals living with human immunodeficiency virus in the United States. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018;5(10):ofy232. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30302356.
- Skerritt L, de Pokomandy A, O’Brien N, et al. Discussing reproductive goals with healthcare providers among women living with HIV in Canada: the role of provider gender and patient comfort. Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2021;29(1):1932702. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34165395.
- Skerritt L, Kaida A, O’Brien N, et al. Patterns of changing pregnancy intentions among women living with HIV in Canada. BMC Womens Health. 2021;21(1):350. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34615492.
- Dasgupta S, Crim SM, Weiser JK, et al. Sexual and reproductive health among cisgender women with HIV aged 18–44 years. Am J Prev Med. 2024;67(1):32-45. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38441506.
- Yan X, Du J, Ji G. Prevalence and factors associated with fertility desire among people living with HIV: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2021;16(3):e0248872. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33735265.
- Murphy EM, Keller JM, Powell AM, et al. Women living with human immunodeficiency virus with intended and unintended pregnancy: characteristics and patient outcomes. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2023;32(4):445-451. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36602512.
- Gokhale RH, Bradley H, Weiser J. Reproductive health counseling delivered to women living with HIV in the United States. AIDS Care. 2017;29(7):928-935. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28114813.
- Tanner AE, Chambers BD, Philbin MM, et al. The intersection between women’s reproductive desires and HIV care providers’ reproductive health practices: a mixed methods analysis. Matern Child Health J. 2018;22(9):1233-1239. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30008042.
- Teodoro N, Fu A, Ohly NT, et al. Long-acting reversible contraception knowledge, attitudes and use among HIV-infected and -uninfected women and their providers. Contraception. 2019;100(4):269-274. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31226320.
- Lampe MA. Human immunodeficiency virus-1 and preconception care. Matern Child Health J. 2006;10(5 Suppl):S193-5. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16832609.
- Aaron EZ, Criniti SM. Preconception health care for HIV-infected women. Top HIV Med. 2007;15(4):137-41. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17721000.
- Anderson J. Women and HIV: motherhood and more. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2012;25(1):58-65. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22156896.
- Jones D, Chakhtoura N, Cook R. Reproductive and maternal healthcare needs of HIV infected women. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2013;10(4):333-41. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23918674.
- Nguyen AT, Curtis KM, Tepper NK, et al. U.S. medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use, 2024. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2024;73(4):1-126. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39106314.
- Carten ML, Kiser JJ, Kwara A, et al. Pharmacokinetic interactions between the hormonal emergency contraception, levonorgestrel (Plan B), and efavirenz. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2012;2012137192. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22536010.
- Scarsi KK, Smeaton LM, Podany AT, et al. PK of dose-adjusted emergency contraception with EFV-based ART in ACTG 5375. Presented at: Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections. 2021.
- Scarsi KK, Smeaton LM, Podany AT, et al. Pharmacokinetics of dose-adjusted levonorgestrel emergency contraception combined with efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy or rifampicin-containing tuberculosis regimens. Contraception. 2023;121109951. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36641094.
- Byrne L, Sconza R, Foster C, et al. Pregnancy incidence and outcomes in women with perinatal HIV infection. AIDS. 2017;31(12):1745-1754. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28590327.
- American College of Obstetricians Gynecologists’ Committee on Gynecologic Practice, American College of Obstetricians Gynecologists’ Committee on Health Care for Underserved Women. Health care for transgender and gender diverse individuals: ACOG committee opinion, number 823. Obstet Gynecol. 2021;137(3):e75-e88. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33595253.
- Taub RL, Ellis SA, Neal-Perry G, et al. The effect of testosterone on ovulatory function in transmasculine individuals. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223(2):229 e1-229 e8. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32044312.
- Mandelbrot L, Tubiana R, Le Chenadec J, et al. No perinatal HIV-1 transmission from women with effective antiretroviral therapy starting before conception. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61(11):1715-25. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26197844.
- Sibiude J, Le Chenadec J, Mandelbrot L, et al. Update of perinatal human immunodeficiency virus type 1 transmission in France: zero transmission for 5,482 mothers on continuous antiretroviral therapy from conception and with undetectable viral load at delivery. Clin Infect Dis. 2023;76(3):e590-e598. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36037040.
- Frazier EL, Esser MB, McKnight-Eily LR, et al. Alcohol use among HIV-positive women of childbearing age, United States, 2013–2014. AIDS Care. 2021;33(8):1024-1036. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32808534.
- Yee LM, Kacanek D, Brightwell C, et al. Marijuana, opioid, and alcohol use among pregnant and postpartum individuals living with HIV in the US. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(12):e2137162. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34860242.
- Cotter AM, Garcia AG, Duthely ML, et al. Is antiretroviral therapy during pregnancy associated with an increased risk of preterm delivery, low birth weight, or stillbirth? J Infect Dis. 2006;193(9):1195-201. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16586354.
- Tuomala RE, Shapiro DE, Mofenson LM, et al. Antiretroviral therapy during pregnancy and the risk of an adverse outcome. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(24):1863-70. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12063370.
- Stek AM. Antiretroviral medications during pregnancy for therapy or prophylaxis. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2009;6(2):68-76. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19358777.
- Murthy N, Wodi AP, Bernstein H, et al. Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommended immunization schedule for adults aged 19 years or older - United States, 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022;71(7):229-233. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35176010.
- Thurman AR, Anderson S and Doncel GF. Effects of hormonal contraception on antiretroviral drug metabolism, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2014;71(6):523-30. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24521428.
- Nakalema S, Chappell CA, Pham M, et al. Pharmacokinetics of levonorgestrel and etonogestrel contraceptive implants over 48 weeks with rilpivirine- or darunavir-based antiretroviral therapy. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2022;77(11):3144-3152. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36059130.
- Todd CS, Lorenzetti L, Mussa A, et al. Drug-drug interactions between antiretrovirals and hormonal contraception: an updated systematic review. Contraception. 2024;110490. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38762199.
- Sekar VJ, Lefebvre E, Guzman SS, et al. Pharmacokinetic interaction between ethinyl estradiol, norethindrone and darunavir with low-dose ritonavir in healthy women. Antivir Ther. 2008;13(4):563-9. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18672535.
- Majeed SR, West S, Ling KH, et al. Confirmation of the drug-drug interaction potential between cobicistat-boosted antiretroviral regimens and hormonal contraceptives. Antivir Ther. 2020;24(8):557-566. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31933482.
- Cohn SE, Park JG, Watts DH, et al. Depo-medroxyprogesterone in women on antiretroviral therapy: effective contraception and lack of clinically significant interactions. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007;81(2):222-7. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17192768.
- Nanda K, Amaral E, Hays M, et al. Pharmacokinetic interactions between depot medroxyprogesterone acetate and combination antiretroviral therapy. Fertil Steril. 2008;90(4):965-71. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17880953.
- Luque AE, Cohn SE, Park JG, et al. Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate in combination with a twice-daily lopinavir-ritonavir-based regimen in HIV-infected women showed effective contraception and a lack of clinically significant interactions, with good safety and tolerability: results of the ACTG 5283 study. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59(4):2094-101. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25624326.
- Weinberg A, Park JG, Bosch R, et al. Effect of depot medoxyprogesterone acetate on immune functions and inflammatory markers of HIV-infected women. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2016;71(2):137-45. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26413850.
- Leticee N, Viard JP, Yamgnane A, et al. Contraceptive failure of etonogestrel implant in patients treated with antiretrovirals including efavirenz. Contraception. 2012;85(4):425-7. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22036046.
- Perry SH, Swamy P, Preidis GA, et al. Implementing the Jadelle implant for women living with HIV in a resource-limited setting in sub-Saharan Africa: concerns for drug interactions leading to unintended pregnancies. AIDS. 2014;28(5). Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24401645.
- Patel RC, Onono M, Gandhi M, et al. Pregnancy rates in HIV-positive women using contraceptives and efavirenz-based or nevirapine-based antiretroviral therapy in Kenya: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet HIV. 2015;2(11):e474-82. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26520927.
- Chappell CA, Lamorde M, Nakalema S, et al. Efavirenz decreases etonogestrel exposure: a pharmacokinetic evaluation of implantable contraception with antiretroviral therapy. AIDS. 2017;31(14):1965-1972. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28692531.
- Scarsi KK, Darin KM, Nakalema S, et al. Unintended pregnancies observed with combined use of the levonorgestrel contraceptive implant and efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy: a three-arm pharmacokinetic evaluation over 48 weeks. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;62(6):675-82. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26646680.
- Agyemang N, Scarsi KK, Baker P, et al. Pharmacogenetic interactions of efavirenz or rifampin and isoniazid with levonorgestrel emergency contraception during treatment of HIV or tuberculosis. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2023;33(6):126-135. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37306344.
- Francis J, Mngqibisa R, McIlleron H, et al. A semimechanistic pharmacokinetic model for depot medroxyprogesterone acetate and drug-drug interactions with antiretroviral and antituberculosis treatment. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021;110(4):1057-1065. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34151439.
- Haas DW, Mngqibisa R, Francis J, et al. Pharmacogenetics of interaction between depot medroxyprogesterone acetate and efavirenz, rifampicin, and isoniazid during treatment of HIV and tuberculosis. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2022;32(1):24-30. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34369424.
- Mngqibisa R, Kendall MA, Dooley K, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate in African women receiving treatment for human immunodeficiency virus and tuberculosis: potential concern for standard dosing frequency. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71(3):517-524. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31504342.
- Blair CS, Li S, Chau G, et al. Brief report: hormonal contraception use and cabotegravir pharmacokinetics in HIV-uninfected women enrolled in HPTN 077. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2020;85(1):93-97. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32452972.
- Scarsi KK, Cramer YS, Rosenkranz SL, et al. Antiretroviral therapy and vaginally administered contraceptive hormones: a three-arm, pharmacokinetic study. Lancet HIV. 2019;6(9):e601-e612. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31498109.
- Tepper NK, Curtis KM, Cox S, et al. Update to U.S. medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use, 2016: updated recommendations for the use of contraception among women at high risk for HIV infection. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(14):405-410. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32271729.
- Sevinsky H, Eley T, Persson A, et al. The effect of efavirenz on the pharmacokinetics of an oral contraceptive containing ethinyl estradiol and norgestimate in healthy HIV-negative women. Antivir Ther. 2011;16(2):149-56. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21447863.
- Landolt NK, Phanuphak N, Ubolyam S, et al. Significant decrease of ethinylestradiol with nevirapine, and of etonogestrel with efavirenz in HIV-positive women. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2014;66(2):e50-2. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24608892.
- Bishop IJ, Gertz AM, Simon B, et al. Etonogestrel concentrations among contraceptive implant users in Botswana using and not using dolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapy. Contraception. 2020;102(3):174-179. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32387328.
- Patel RC, Stalter RM, Thomas KK, et al. A pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenetic evaluation of contraceptive implants and antiretroviral therapy among women in Kenya and Uganda. AIDS. 2019;33(13):1995-2004. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31306173.
- Vieira CS, Bahamondes MV, de Souza RM, et al. Effect of antiretroviral therapy including lopinavir/ritonavir or efavirenz on etonogestrel-releasing implant pharmacokinetics in HIV-positive women. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2014;66(4):378-85. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24798768.
- Pfitzer A, Wille J, Wambua J, et al. Contraceptive implant failures among women using antiretroviral therapy in western Kenya: a retrospective cohort study. Gates Open Res. 2019;31482. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32051928.
- Tang JH, Davis NL, Corbett AH, et al. Effect of efavirenz on levonorgestrel concentrations among Malawian levonorgestrel implant users for up to 30 months of concomitant use: a subanalysis of a randomized clinical trial. Contracept X. 2020;2100027. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33364598.
- Cirrincione LR, Nakalema S, Chappell CA, et al. Effect of double-dose levonorgestrel subdermal implant in women taking efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy: the DoubLNG pharmacokinetic study. Contraception. 2023;122109975. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36787829.
- Haas DW, Cramer YS, Godfrey C, et al. Pharmacogenetic interactions between antiretroviral drugs and vaginally administered hormonal contraceptives. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2020;30(3):45-53. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32106141.
- Polis CB, Curtis KM. Use of hormonal contraceptives and HIV acquisition in women: a systematic review of the epidemiological evidence. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013;13(9):797-808. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23871397.
- Watts DH, Park JG, Cohn SE, et al. Safety and tolerability of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate among HIV-infected women on antiretroviral therapy: ACTG A5093. Contraception. 2008;77(2):84-90. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18226670.
- Pyra M, Heffron R, Mugo NR, et al. Effectiveness of hormonal contraception in HIV-infected women using antiretroviral therapy. AIDS. 2015;29(17):2353-9. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26544706.
- Clark RA, Theall K. Population-based study evaluating association between selected antiretroviral therapies and potential oral contraceptive failure. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2004;37(1):1219-20. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15319685.
- Landolt NK, Phanuphak N, Ubolyam S, et al. Efavirenz, in contrast to nevirapine, is associated with unfavorable progesterone and antiretroviral levels when coadministered with combined oral contraceptives. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013;62(5):534-9. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23187949.
- Scholler-Gyure M, Kakuda TN, Woodfall B, et al. Effect of steady-state etravirine on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ethinylestradiol and norethindrone. Contraception. 2009;80(1):44-52. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19501215.
- Mildvan D, Yarrish R, Marshak A, et al. Pharmacokinetic interaction between nevirapine and ethinyl estradiol/norethindrone when administered concurrently to HIV-infected women. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2002;29(5):471-7. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11981363.
- Stuart GS, Moses A, Corbett A, et al. Combined oral contraceptives and antiretroviral PK/PD in Malawian women: pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a combined oral contraceptive and a generic combined formulation antiretroviral in Malawi. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2011;58(2):e40-3. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21921726.
- Muro E, Droste JA, Hofstede HT, et al. Nevirapine plasma concentrations are still detectable after more than 2 weeks in the majority of women receiving single-dose nevirapine: implications for intervention studies. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005;39(4):419-21. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16010163.
- Day S, Graham SM, Masese LN, et al. A prospective cohort study of the effect of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate on detection of plasma and cervical HIV-1 in women initiating and continuing antiretroviral therapy. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2014;66(4):452-6. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24798764.
- Hubacher D, Liku J, Kiarie J, et al. Effect of concurrent use of anti-retroviral therapy and levonorgestrel sub-dermal implant for contraception on CD4 counts: a prospective cohort study in Kenya. J Int AIDS Soc. 2013;1618448. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23458102.
- Myer L, Carter RJ, Katyal M, et al. Impact of antiretroviral therapy on incidence of pregnancy among HIV-infected women in sub-Saharan Africa: a cohort study. PLoS Med. 2010;7(2):e1000229. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20161723.
- Nanda K, Delany-Moretlwe S, Dube K, et al. Nevirapine-based antiretroviral therapy does not reduce oral contraceptive effectiveness. AIDS. 2013;27 Suppl 1S17-25. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24088680.
- Crauwels HM, van Heeswijk RP, Buelens A, et al. Lack of an effect of rilpivirine on the pharmacokinetics of ethinylestradiol and norethindrone in healthy volunteers. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014;52(2):118-28. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24161160.
- Khalilieh SG, Yee KL, Sanchez RI, et al. Doravirine and the potential for CYP3A-mediated drug-drug interactions. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019;63(5):e02016-18. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30783000.
- Zhang J, Chung E, Yones C, et al. The effect of atazanavir/ritonavir on the pharmacokinetics of an oral contraceptive containing ethinyl estradiol and norgestimate in healthy women. Antivir Ther. 2011;16(2):157-64. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21447864.
- DuBois BN, Atrio J, Stanczyk FZ, et al. Increased exposure of norethindrone in HIV+ women treated with ritonavir-boosted atazanavir therapy. Contraception. 2015;91(1):71-5. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25245190.
- Vogler MA, Patterson K, Kamemoto L, et al. Contraceptive efficacy of oral and transdermal hormones when co-administered with protease inhibitors in HIV-1-infected women: pharmacokinetic results of ACTG trial A5188. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010;55(4):473-82. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20842042.
- Elliot ER, Bisdomini E, Penchala SD, et al. Pharmacokinetics (PK) of ethinylestradiol/levonorgestrel co-administered with atazanavir/cobicistat. HIV Res Clin Pract. 2019;1-10. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31335301.
- Food and Drug Administration. Atazanavir (Reyataz). 2020. Available at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2020/021567s044,206352s008lbl.pdf.
- Abel S, Russell D, Whitlock LA, et al. Effect of maraviroc on the pharmacokinetics of midazolam, lamivudine/zidovudine, and ethinyloestradiol/levonorgestrel in healthy volunteers. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2008;65 Suppl 119-26. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18333862.
- Song IH, Borland J, Chen S, et al. Dolutegravir has no effect on the pharmacokinetics of oral contraceptives with norgestimate and ethinyl estradiol. Ann Pharmacother. 2015;49(7):784-9. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25862012.
- Food and Drug Administration. Stribild (elvitegravir, cobicitstat, emtricitabine, tenofovir disaproxil fumarate). 2020. Available at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2020/203100s035lbl.pdf.
- Food and Drug Administration. Genvoya (elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide). 2021. Available at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2021/207561s025lbl.pdf.
- Anderson MS, Hanley WD, Moreau AR, et al. Effect of raltegravir on estradiol and norgestimate plasma pharmacokinetics following oral contraceptive administration in healthy women. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2011;71(4):616-20. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21395656.
- Nwokolo N, Post E, Mageau AS, et al. Fostemsavir and ethinyl estradiol drug interaction: clinical recommendations for co-administration. HIV Med. 2023;24(5):580-587. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36372442.
Prepregnancy Counseling and Care
Overview
Panel's Recommendations |
---|
|
Rating of Recommendations: A = Strong; B = Moderate; C = Optional Rating of Evidence: I = One or more randomized trials with clinical outcomes and/or validated laboratory endpoints; II = One or more well-designed, nonrandomized trials or observational cohort studies with long-term clinical outcomes; III = Expert opinion |
Table 3. Drug Interactions Between Antiretroviral Agents and Hormonal Contraceptives
Non-nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors (NNRTIs) | |
---|---|
Efavirenz (EFV) | |
Dosing Recommendation/Clinical Comment for COC/P/R, POPs, and ENG Implants | If efficacy is of primary importance, consider an alternative method (or a reliable method of barrier contraception in addition to this method). |
Dosing Recommendation/Clinical Comment for DMPAa | No additional contraceptive protection is needed. |
Effect on Contraceptive Drug Levels and the Contraceptive’s Effects on ART and HIV | COC No effect on EE concentrations ↓ active metabolites of norgestimate; LNG AUC ↓ 83% and norelgestromin AUC ↓ 64%58 ENG (in COC) C24h ↓ 61%59 ENG ↓ 79%; EE ↓ 59%56 DMPA No effect on DMPA levels42,43 DMPA AUC ↓ 33% to 35% when coadministered with EFV, rifampin, and INH. More frequent DMPA dosing may be appropriate.54 ENG Implant ENG ↓ below the level necessary to prevent pregnancy (90 pg/mL) in 60% receiving EFV60 ↓ 49% ENG concentration61 ENG AUC ↓ 63% to 82%49,62 LNG Implant ↓ 61% LNG concentration61 LNG AUC ↓ 47%50 ↑ pregnancy incidence rate among women using LNG or ENG implants, more among ENG users63 LNG AUC ↓ 40% to 73% over 30 months of use64 Doubling the dose of LNG implant from 150 mg to 300 mg did not overcome the decrease in LNG concentration.65 LNG Emergency Contraception (Oral Dosing) LNG (emergency contraception) AUC ↓ 58%23 Cmax was 51% higher with 3 mg LNG (24.9 ng/mL) than with 1.5 mg (15.1 ng/mL), and the 48-hour concentration was 66% higher (0.6 vs. 0.3 ng/mL, respectively). Dose adjustment of LNG EC from 1.5 mg to 3 mg helped to overcome the drug–drug interaction in women receiving EFV-based ART.24 Vaginally Administered ENG/EE (Vaginal Ring) ENG ↓ 93% in CYP2B6 slow metabolizers and ↓ 75% in normal and intermediate metabolizers66 EE ↓ 75% in slow metabolizers and ↓ 41% in normal and intermediate metabolizers66 Changes in ARV Levels and/or Effects on HIV COC No effect on EFV concentrations58 EFV C12h ↓ 22%; under therapeutic threshold in 3 of 16 participants59 DMPA No effect on HIV disease progression42,67,68 No effect on EFV concentrations42 LNG Implant No effect on HIV disease progression50 |
Clinical Studies | COC No difference in pregnancy rates69 Pregnancy rate was 13% higher in women using COCs and EFV than in women using COCs alone.48,70 Progesterone >3 ng/mL (a surrogate for ovulation) in 3 of 16 women71 No ovulations58 DMPA No increase in pregnancies42,48,68,69 Low endogenous progesterone, consistent with no ovulation42,43,68 ENG Implant Pregnancy rate was higher with EFV compared with no ART but still lower with implants than with other hormonal methods of contraception48 Presumptive ovulation in 5%62 LNG Implant 12% pregnancy rate47 15% pregnancy rate50 Pregnancy rate was higher with EFV compared with no ART but still lower with implants than with other hormonal methods of contraception.48 No increase in pregnancy rate69 |
Justification/Evidence for Recommendation | For COCs, some studies suggest higher pregnancy rate and ovulation rate and decreased progestin levels. EFV levels may decrease, but clinical significance is unclear. For DMPA, evidence does not show effects on pregnancy rate, ovulation, or DMPA levels. Also, no effect on HIV disease progression or EFV levels. More frequent DMPA dosing may be appropriate for women receiving rifampicin, INH, and EFV. For implants, some studies suggest higher pregnancy rate and decreased hormone levels. For vaginally administered ENG/EE, PK evaluation showed that ENG levels were 79% lower and EE levels were 59% lower in participants on EFV than in controls after 21 days.56 |
Etravirine (ETR) | |
Dosing Recommendation/Clinical Comment for COC/P/R, POPs, DMPAa, ENG Implants | No additional contraceptive protection is needed. |
Effect on Contraceptive Drug Levels and the Contraceptive’s Effects on ART and HIV | EE AUC ↑ 22%72 No significant effect on NE72 |
Clinical Studies | COC No ovulations75 |
Justification/Evidence for Recommendation | For COCs, one study found no ovulations and no significant change in progestin levels. No data on POPs. |
Nevirapine (NVP) | |
Dosing Recommendation/Clinical Comment for COC/P/R, POPs, DMPAa, ENG Implants | No additional contraceptive protection is needed. |
Effect on Contraceptive Drug Levels and the Contraceptive’s Effects on ART and HIV | EE AUC ↓ 29%;73 no change in EE AUC74 NE AUC ↓ 18%73 ENG (in COC) C24h ↓ 22%59 DMPA No significant change42 LNG Implant LNG AUC ↑ 35%50 ↑ pregnancy incidence rate among women using LNG or ENG implants, more among ENG users63 Changes in ARV Levels and/or Effects on HIV COC No significant effect on NVP levels71,73,75 DMPA No effect on HIV disease progression42,67,68,76 LNG Implant No effect on HIV disease progression50,77 |
Clinical Studies | COC No increase in pregnancy rate48,69,70,78,79 No ovulations71,74,79 DMPA No increase in pregnancy rates48,68,69,78 Low serum progesterone, consistent with no ovulation42 ENG Implant No increase in pregnancy rate48 LNG Implant No increase in pregnancy rate47,48,50,69,77 |
Justification/Evidence for Recommendation | For COCs, evidence does not show effects on pregnancy rate or ovulations. Evidence demonstrated a small decrease in progestin levels. No effect on NVP levels. For DMPA, evidence does not show effects on pregnancy rate, ovulation, or DMPA levels. No effect on HIV disease progression. For implants, evidence does not show effects on pregnancy rate or HIV disease progression. |
Rilpivirine (Oralb RPV) | |
Dosing Recommendation/Clinical Comment for COC/P/R, POPs, DMPAa, ENG or LNG Implants | No additional contraceptive protection is needed. |
Effect on Contraceptive Drug Levels and the Contraceptive’s Effects on ART and HIV | EE AUC ↑ 14%80 No significant change on NE80 Changes in ARV Levels and/or Effects on HIV COC No change in RPV levels compared to historical controls80 ENG or LNG Implants ENG and LNG concentrations not altered with RPV-based ART38 |
Clinical Studies | COC No change in progesterone80 |
Justification/Evidence for Recommendation | For COCs, evidence does not show effects on ovulation or progestin levels. No change in RPV levels. No data on POPs |
Doravirine (DOR) | |
Dosing Recommendation/Clinical Comment for COC/P/R, POPs, DMPAa, ENG Implants | No additional contraceptive protection is needed. |
Effect on Contraceptive Drug Levels and the Contraceptive’s Effects on ART and HIV | No clinically significant interaction with EE and LNG81 |
Clinical Studies | N/A |
Justification/Evidence for Recommendation | No clinical data |
Ritonavir (RTV)-Boosted Protease Inhibitors (PIs) | |
Atazanavir/Ritonavir (ATV/r) | |
Dosing Recommendation/Clinical Comment for COC/P/R, POPs, DMPAa, ENG Implants | No additional contraceptive protection is needed. |
Effect on Contraceptive Drug Levels and the Contraceptive’s Effects on ART and HIV | EE AUC ↓ 19%82 Norgestimate AUC ↑ 85%82 POP NE AUC ↑ 50%83 Vaginally Administered ENG/EE ENG ↑ 71% EE ↓ 38%56 |
Clinical Studies | N/A |
Justification/Evidence for Recommendation | For COCs, increase in progestin levels seen in only one study. Using a COC with at least 35 mcg/day may decrease breakthrough bleeding. For POPs, increase in progestin levels seen in only one study RTV inhibits CYP3A4, which may increase contraceptive hormone levels. |
Darunavir/Ritonavir (DRV/r) | |
Dosing Recommendation/Clinical Comment for COC/P/R, POPs, and ENG or LNG Implants | If efficacy is of primary importance, can consider an alternative method (or a reliable method of barrier contraception in addition to this method) |
Dosing Recommendation/Clinical Comment for DMPAa | No additional contraceptive protection is needed. |
Effect on Contraceptive Drug Levels and the Contraceptive’s Effects on ART and HIV | EE AUC ↓ 44%40 NE AUC ↓ 14%40 ENG or LNG Implants Progestin concentrations higher with DRV/r-based ART but no related adverse effects38 |
Clinical Studies | N/A |
Justification/Evidence for Recommendation | For COCs, small decrease in progestin levels No data on POPs |
Lopinavir/Ritonavir (LPV/r) | |
Dosing Recommendation/Clinical Comment for COC/P/R, POPs, DMPAa, ENG Implants | No additional contraceptive protection is needed. |
Effect on Contraceptive Drug Levels and the Contraceptive’s Effects on ART and HIV | EE AUC ↓ 55%84 NE AUC ↓ 17% Patch EE AUC ↓ 45%84 Norelgestromin AUC ↑ 83%84 DMPA DMPA AUC ↑ 46%44 ENG Implant ENG AUC ↑ 52%62 Changes in ARV Levels and/or Effects on HIV Patch LPV/r ↓ 19%84 DMPA No effect on HIV disease progression44 No change in LPV/r levels44 |
Clinical Studies | COC Trend of increased pregnancy rate, but CIs overlap48 Patch Low serum progesterone84 consistent with no ovulations (n = 8) DMPA No pregnancies and no ovulations44 Trend of increased pregnancy rate, but CIs overlap48 ENG Implant No increase in pregnancy rate48 LNG Implant No increase in pregnancy rate47,48 |
Justification/Evidence for Recommendation | For COCs, nonsignificant increase in pregnancy rate and small decrease in progestin level. For patch, no ovulations, and progestin levels increased. For DMPA, evidence shows no effect on pregnancy rate or ovulations. Progestin levels increased. For implants, evidence shows no effect on pregnancy rate. Progestin levels increased. |
Cobicistat (COBI)-Boosted Protease Inhibitors (PIs) | |
Atazanavir/Cobicistat (ATV/c) | |
Dosing Recommendation/Clinical Comment for COC/P/R | Contraindicated with drospirenone-containing hormonal contraceptives due to potential for hyperkalemia. |
Dosing Recommendation/Clinical Comment for POPs, DMPAa, ENG Implants | No additional contraceptive protection is needed. |
Effect on Contraceptive Drug Levels and the Contraceptive’s Effects on ART and HIV | Drospirenone AUC ↑ 2.3-fold41 No change in LNG concentration 25% decrease in EE C2485 |
Clinical Studies | N/A |
Justification/Evidence for Recommendation | No data on POPs |
Darunavir/Cobicistat (DRV/c) | |
Dosing Recommendation/Clinical Comment for COC/P/R | Clinical monitoring is recommended when DRV/c is used in combination with drospirenone-containing COCs as a result of the potential for hyperkalemia. |
Dosing Recommendation/Clinical Comment for POPs, DMPAa, ENG Implants | No additional contraceptive protection is needed. |
Effect on Contraceptive Drug Levels and the Contraceptive’s Effects on ART and HIV | Drospirenone AUC ↑ 1.6-fold EE AUC ↓ 30%41 |
Clinical Studies | N/A |
Justification/Evidence for Recommendation | No data on POPs |
Protease Inhibitors (PIs) Without Ritonavir (RTV) | |
Atazanavir (ATV) | |
Dosing Recommendation/Clinical Comment for COC/P/R | Prescribe oral contraceptive that contains no more than 30 mcg of EE or recommend alternative contraceptive method. |
Dosing Recommendation/Clinical Comment for POPs, DMPAa, ENG Implants | No additional contraceptive protection is needed. |
Effect on Contraceptive Drug Levels and the Contraceptive’s Effects on ART and HIV | COC EE AUC ↑ 48%86 NE AUC ↑ 110%86 |
Clinical Studies | N/A |
Justification/Evidence for Recommendation | For COCs, increased concentrations of estrogen and progestin, but the only data available are from the product label. No data on POPs |
CCR5 Antagonist | |
Maraviroc (MVC) | |
Dosing Recommendation/Clinical Comment for COC/P/R, POPs, DMPAa, ENG Implants | No additional contraceptive protection is needed. |
Effect on Contraceptive Drug Levels and the Contraceptive’s Effects on ART and HIV | COC No significant effect on EE or LN87 |
Clinical Studies | N/A |
Justification/Evidence for Recommendation | For COCs, no change in EE or progestin. No clinical data. No data on POPs |
Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors (INSTIs) | |
Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF) | |
Dosing Recommendation/Clinical Comment for COC/P/R, POPs, DMPAa, ENG Implants | No additional contraceptive protection is needed. |
Effect on Contraceptive Drug Levels and the Contraceptive’s Effects on ART and HIV | No significant drug interactions with EE or norgestimate |
Clinical Studies | N/A |
Justification/Evidence for Recommendation | No clinical data |
Dolutegravir (DTG) | |
Dosing Recommendation/Clinical Comment for COC/P/R, POPs, DMPAa, ENG Implants | No additional contraceptive protection is needed. |
Effect on Contraceptive Drug Levels and the Contraceptive’s Effects on ART and HIV | COC No significant effect on ENG implants60 No significant effect on norgestimate or EE No change in DTG AUC88 |
Clinical Studies | N/A |
Justification/Evidence for Recommendation | For COCs, no change in EE or progestin. No clinical data. No data on POPs |
Elvitegravir/Cobicistat (EVG/c) | |
Dosing Recommendation/Clinical Comment for COC/P/R, POPs, DMPAa, ENG Implants | No additional contraceptive protection is needed. |
Effect on Contraceptive Drug Levels and the Contraceptive’s Effects on ART and HIV | COC Norgestimate AUC ↑ 126% EE AUC ↓ 25%89,90 |
Clinical Studies | N/A |
Justification/Evidence for Recommendation | When administered as the four-drug regimen EVG/c/FTC/TDF, increases in progestin and a small decrease in EE were observed. No clinical data. No data on POPs |
Raltegravir (RAL) | |
Dosing Recommendation/Clinical Comment for COC/P/R, POPs, DMPAa, ENG Implants | No additional contraceptive protection is needed. |
Effect on Contraceptive Drug Levels and the Contraceptive’s Effects on ART and HIV | COC No change in EE Norgestimate AUC ↑ 14%91 |
Clinical Studies | N/A |
Justification/Evidence for Recommendation | For COCs, no change in EE concentrations and a small increase in progestin concentrations. No clinical data. No data on POPs. |
Long-Acting Cabotegravir (CAB-LA) | |
Dosing Recommendation/Clinical Comment for COC/P/R, POPs, DMPAa, ENG Implants | No additional contraceptive protection is needed. |
Effect on Contraceptive Drug Levels and the Contraceptive’s Effects on ART and HIV | Oral contraceptive use was associated with lower CAB-LA Cmax than for women not on any hormonal contraception (GMR 0.75; 90% CI, 0.59–0.93; P = 0.033). However, oral contraceptive use did not result in significant differences in other CAB-LA PK parameters. |
Clinical Studies | N/A |
Justification/Evidence for Recommendation | Although oral contraceptive use was associated with lower CAB-LA peak concentration, no differences in other PK parameters were observed, suggesting that the association is not likely to be clinically significant. |
Entry and Attachment Inhibitors | |
Fostemsavir (FTR) | |
Dosing Recommendation/Clinical Comment for COC/P/R, POPs, DMPAa, ENG Implants | No additional contraceptive protection is needed. |
Effect on Contraceptive Drug Levels and the Contraceptive’s Effects on ART and HIV | Temsavir (the active moiety of FTR) increased EE concentrations by 40% but had no effect on NE concentrations. EE dose should not exceed 30 µg or equivalent.92 FTR did not impact progestin. Progestin-only and nonhormonal contraceptives will not be affected by FTR. |
Clinical Studies | N/A |
Justification/Evidence for Recommendation | No clinical data |
a Because the hormonal levels achieved with DMPA are substantially higher than the levels that are required for contraception, any small reduction in hormonal level attributed to ARV drugs is unlikely to reduce contraceptive effectiveness. b No data are available for long-acting RPV. Key to Symbols: ↑ = increase ↓ = decrease Key: ART = antiretroviral therapy; ARV = antiretroviral; ATV = atazanavir; ATV/c = atazanavir/cobicistat; ATV/r = atazanavir/ritonavir; AUC = area under the curve; BIC = bictegravir; C12h = concentration at 12 hours postdose; C24h = concentration at 24 hours postdose; CAB-LA = long-acting cabotegravir; CI = confidence interval; Cmax; = maximum plasma concentration; COBI = cobicistat; COC = combined oral contraceptives; COC/P/R = COC/patch/ring; CYP = cytochrome P450; DMPA = depot medroxyprogesterone acetate; DOR = doravirine; DRV/c = darunavir/cobicistat; DRV/r = darunavir/ritonavir; DTG = dolutegravir; EC = emergency contraception; EE = ethinyl estradiol; EFV = efavirenz; ENG = etonogestrel; ETR = etravirine; EVG/c = elvitegravir/cobicistat; FTC = emtricitabine; FTR = fostemsavir; GMR = geometric mean ratio; INH = isoniazid; INSTI = integrase strand transfer inhibitor; LNG = levonorgestrel; LPV/r = lopinavir/ritonavir; MVC = maraviroc; NE = norethindrone; NNRTI = non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor; NVP = nevirapine; PI = protease inhibitor; PK = pharmacokinetic; POP = progesterone-only oral contraceptive pills; RAL = raltegravir; RPV = rilpivirine; RTV = ritonavir; TAF = tenofovir alafenamide; TDF = tenofovir disoproxil fumarate Sources: Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents; Adult and Adolescent Antiretroviral Guidelines; Table 24a, Table 24b, and Table 24d |
Download Guidelines
-
Section Only PDF (285.53 KB)
-
Full Guideline PDF (5.68 MB)
-
Recommendations Only PDF (418.44 KB)
-
Tables Only PDF (885.1 KB)